When GitOps Isn’t the Right Tool for the Job
A practical look at when GitOps adds complexity instead of clarity
GitOps has earned its reputation as a powerful pattern for managing infrastructure and application delivery—version-controlled state, declarative configuration, and automated reconciliation loops make it attractive for teams seeking reliability and repeatability. But like many methodologies, it’s not a universal fit. In the wrong setting, GitOps can add more complexity than value.
And in today’s hybrid IT world—where organizations are often stretched across multiple platforms, toolsets, and operational cultures—the choice to adopt GitOps must be driven by operational reality, not industry hype.
1. Small Teams With Simple Deployments
If you’re a three-person startup running a single web service, GitOps can feel like installing an aircraft cockpit to drive a scooter.
The Git repositories, reconciliation agents, and policy tooling might outweigh the simplicity of manual deployments or lightweight CI/CD.
Keith Townsend often warns about “being spread across too many communities” in the enterprise IT space. The same principle applies here: If your technical ecosystem is small, don’t dilute your focus with heavyweight operational models designed for complex, scaled environments.
2. Low Operational Maturity
GitOps assumes:
You already run clean, declarative infrastructure.
Configuration is fully automated.
Your team is fluent in version control workflows.
If you’re still mixing console clicks with occasional IaC commits, GitOps will amplify operational chaos instead of reducing it.
Keith has observed that the life cycle of a DevOps movement starts with a high-value, revenue-generating application—and then builds a culture and automation framework around it. Without that cultural and procedural maturity, you risk spending more time fighting your GitOps reconciliation loops than delivering value.
Think of organizations still wrestling with Kubernetes basics—sometimes even struggling to move from docker run commands to proper manifests. In those cases, GitOps is several steps ahead of where the team’s operational muscle is today.
3. Heterogeneous Platform Mix
GitOps shines in Kubernetes-native environments. But enterprises rarely have the luxury of uniformity.
Part of your stack may be declarative and cloud-native, while another part lives on legacy systems that require imperative scripts.
Some workloads have operators or reconciliation controllers; others rely on manual or procedural deployment steps.
The result? Two operational workflows—one GitOps-based, one traditional. This is exactly the kind of platform sprawl Keith warns about in hybrid environments. While Kubernetes might be “the best platform to get to a private cloud infrastructure,” the transition is never all-at-once, and operational duality often lingers for years.
4. Rapid Experimentation Environments
When you’re in constant prototype mode—data science sandboxes, hackathon projects, disposable dev clusters—every code commit gate slows experimentation.
For workloads that live for hours or days, the ceremony of pull requests, reviews, and merges into main for deployment is often overhead without return. In these scenarios, speed and informality trump traceability.
5. Heavy Secrets Management Requirements
While GitOps integrates with secret managers, it also makes secrets management more complex:
Secrets should never land in Git, even encrypted.
Key rotation and reconciliation must be carefully choreographed.
For teams without disciplined secrets hygiene, GitOps can introduce both operational bottlenecks and security exposure.
6. When Human Judgment Is the Deployment Trigger
Certain releases—think major cutovers under load—require human decision-making based on live conditions.
GitOps works best when deployment is a consequence of a merged commit, not a judgement call based on production signals. If your operational culture depends on human-triggered releases, GitOps may force you into awkward workarounds.
Final Thoughts: Fit Before Fashion
GitOps is a force multiplier when your team maturity, platform consistency, and operational culture align with its principles. But in the wrong context, it’s like fitting a complex autopilot into a paper airplane—overkill and potentially dangerous.
Keith’s Core Advisory:
Before adopting GitOps, CTOs and engineering leaders should ask:
Is our operational maturity ready for declarative everything?
Do our platforms support a single operational model, or will we be running two in parallel?
Is our culture disciplined enough to treat Git as the source of truth for all environments?
Are we chasing business value—or chasing a buzzword?
GitOps is a tool, not a strategy. Use it when it serves your mission—not the other way around.
Have you tried Keith on Call GPT? It’s a strategy GPT based on 800K words from my public work. Did I mention it’s free?